China Government Agency Rules in Favor of LandGlass in Glaston Case

China’s Patent Reexamination Board, based in Beijing, has ruled in favor of China-based LandGlass Inc. in a patent infringement case filed by Glaston, according to information from both Glaston and LandGlass. Glaston had filed the suit last year, alleging patent infringement related to “certain glass tempering machines” sold in mainland China.

“The Patent Reexamination Board in Beijing has given a decision to invalidate Glaston’s patent based on LandGlass’ invalidation claim against the said patent,” says Glaston CEO Arto Metsänen in a statement issued to USGNN.com/USGlass magazine. “Although we are disappointed on the decision as the same patent is valid across the world, it was not a complete surprise considering the proceedings in China.”

However, Glaston officials say the case may not be over.

“Consequently, we have initiated proceedings to cancel the invalidation decision and in the meanwhile have withdrawn our infringement claim against LandGlass from the Suzhou court in order to reserve a right to bring it to the court again,” adds Metsanen.

LandGlass issued a statement as well, saying a trial was held last October in the Jiangsu Suzhou Intermediate People’s Court and on March 20 Glaston “applied to the court for withdrawal of the prosecution.” Additionally, IGE officials say the withdrawal was approved and Glaston assumed the legal costs for the case.

This entry was posted in Featured News, News, Today's News, Uncategorized and tagged , . Bookmark the permalink.

One Response to China Government Agency Rules in Favor of LandGlass in Glaston Case

  1. Does not surprise me. I recently returned from a three week trip to Asia, my first, and I was amazed that every major brand that we recognize in the world today is knocked off and blatantly sold as copies everywhere! Even the labels of the “knock offs” have copied the location of where a particular brand item would actually be manufactured if it was an original. They don’t believe or protect any rights of intellectual property. Good or bad that is the reality. Also I am now a big supporter of the EPA. The pollution there is a killer.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Powered by sweet Captcha