
Demystifying
the Drainage Debate
by
Sean Davies
As a whole,
the window industry has never truly understood the issues surrounding water
damage and window drainage. Many misconceptions still exist regarding how to
best handle drainage issues. 
Myth #1:
A horizontal slider that tilts in for cleaning is a worst-case scenario for
water drainage.
Most
of the window industry believes that in order to achieve good water test
results, you have to compromise air performance. This is inaccurate, yet is
still widely accepted as fact because water that leaks into a window has to be
redirected outside. This requires holes to be cut into a window so water can be
released. But these holes also allow air in-- the more holes there are, the
worse the air performance is.
Weep
holes are required for proper drainage of any slider window. Many manufacturers
tend to use sub-standard weep covers (or none at all) in order to reduce
production costs. Unfortunately,
they often risk their company’s reputation for quality windows for the sake of
a few pennies.
Proper
weep covers should incorporate a one-way valve in the weeper assembly that snaps
snugly in place over the hole. The valve is key to preventing air from being
forced into the window from outside winds, while allowing water to drain out
from the inside track of the sash.
Myth
#2:
It
takes magic to pass the water test.
The standard water test is graded by pressure--one-tenth of the structural
pressure of a window. That means for Level 20 (30 pounds per square foot
structural), a window would have to pass the water test at three pounds per
square foot of pressure. When water leaks into the window, it accumulates in the
sill until it builds up enough pressure to open the one-way valve. Therefore,
more pressure must be exerted inside the sill than exerted on the exterior of
the window by external forces like wind.
By
merely factoring the density of the water at 62.5 pounds per foot and
multiplying it by the height of a window sill, manufacturers can determine how
high their sills need to be in order to overcome outside wind pressure. If you
have proper drain holes channelled in the right way, you will ensure that your
window passes the water test. There’s really no magic involved--it’s just
regular old physics.
When
a window is tested, the amount of water sprayed on it is quite excessive (twice
as much pressure as ever recorded in North America). Not surprisingly, this
causes water to leak in, because all windows will leak to a certain extent. But
that water has to be channelled back out. It has to drain out at least as
quickly as it’s coming in, or it’s going to start backing up.
When
designing weepers we calculate the flow rate and pressure required and determine
what size opening is needed to allow the same amount of water coming in to be
drained out. If you have a tiny hole and you want the water to exit at a certain
speed, more pressure needs to be applied. When you have a bigger hole, more
water can be drained at less pressure. Drainage systems should be engineered so
that water can flow out under low pressure.
Hanging
Drainage Myths Out to Dry
Not all weepers are created equal. The majority of weep-hole covers on the
market today are constructed of nylon. This can cause problems for manufacturers
and homeowners with windows that incorporate weep covers with one-way valves.
Nylon
tends to absorb water which causes it to swell ever so slightly. When we’re
dealing with small components with tight tolerances, swelling of the weep cover
can cause the one-way valve to jam in the open position, allowing wind and
insects to penetrate the sash. To rectify this problem, manufacturers should
select a weeper with a non-hydroscopic reed valve designed to work in the
low-pressure environments of window and door sills.
To
prevent the reed valve from being forced shut by water streaming down the
outside of the sash, proper weep covers should incorporate a hood over the
valve.
By taking an engineering approach to design, hardware manufacturers like ours are evaporating old drainage myths and giving window manufacturers the opportunity to minimize water damage and costly service repairs without sacrificing air performance for water performance.
Sean
Davies is the chief executive officer and director of engineering for
Preferred Engineering Products based in Vaughan, Ontario.
DWM
© Copyright Key Communications Inc. All rights reserved. No reproduction of any type
without expressed written permission.