CPS still aims to establish a pattern solar glass manufacturing facility in the southern U.S. that could produce 4GW of solar glass annually. Photo: Pixabay.

Canadian Premium Sand Inc. (CPS) is moving forward with a plan to establish a pattern solar glass manufacturing facility in the southern United States that could produce 4 gigawatts equivalent pattern solar glass annually. The news comes despite trade uncertainties, potential tariffs and proposed cuts to clean energy funding and incentives.

In an operational update, CPS officials state that the company executed a letter of intent proposal for a 12-year lease of a property where a glass manufacturing facility operated before closing in 2020. Officials say the 850,000-square-foot building provides an opportunity for capital-efficient market entry for a pattern solar glass manufacturing operation. Under the lease terms, CPS can purchase the site at a predetermined price during the lease period.

CPS selected Toledo Engineering Company Inc. and Bottero S.p.A. to advance pre-construction engineering, working with Green City Glass as the owner’s engineer.

Officials explain that the move into the U.S. “supports our customers’ efforts to develop a transparent and domestic U.S. manufacturing supply chain and aligns with the stated goal of the U.S. federal administration to reshore manufacturing.” The White House is pushing for more domestic manufacturing via tariffs, incentives and import regulations.

Officials say CPS’ foray into the U.S. could cost up to $350 million. However, CPS faces several financial headwinds due to uncertainty related to U.S. import tariffs on Canadian goods, as well as proposed cuts to the Inflation Reduction Act, which could have an “adverse effect on CPS’ ability to secure premium pricing for U.S.-made pattern solar glass over Asia-Pacific import glass prices.”

Most of the global production of patterned solar glass is supplied by China-based companies.

1 Comment

  1. The last paragraph related to financial headwinds on Canadian goods due to tariffs – is absolutely incorrect, if – as planned – the plant is built in the USA, and products flow from a US manufacturing site to US solar manufacturers. Get your facts straight please, before publishing

Comments are closed.